NH court rules that the ‘hospitalization in emergencies’ of people with mental health crisis violates the law

NH court rules that the ‘hospitalization in emergencies’ of people with mental health crisis violates the law

The Department of Health and Human Services, represented by the Attorney General’s office, countered that the three-day clock for a hearing doesn’t start until after the person is transferred to a specialty psychiatric hospital, and not while the person waits inside an emergency room for a bed to open up. In Jane Doe’s case, that wait lasted 17 days due to a shortage of beds statewide, during which time she was not afforded a court hearing.  In their 18-page decision, the justices wrote that while the system is overburdened, leading to long wait times due to a shortage of beds, the statute, as written, spells out the need for a timely hearing for those who want to challenge their confinement.

“We do not opine as to how the defendant should comply with its statutorily-mandated duty as our system of government entrusts such decisions to our coordinate branches,” wrote the justices. “Of course, if the legislature disagrees with our interpretation, it is free to amend the statutory scheme as it sees fit within constitutional bounds.” ER boarding, as this practice was came to be called, first emerged in New Hampshire in 2012, when demand for mental health services began outpacing the number of inpatient psychiatric beds.

“For far too long, a lack of community-based mental health treatment options has meant some people, including our clients, have been held without probable cause hearings for weeks in emergency rooms, without access to a state-appointed lawyer or an opportunity to timely contest their detention,” said Gilles Bissonnette, legal director for the ACLU of New Hampshire, which helped argue the case, in a statement. “It also means they have often been unable to return home to their families or jobs.” In 2018, the ACLU filed a class action suit in federal court accusing the government of violating statutory rights of people in mental health crises. The court issued a preliminary ruling in favor of the ACLU; the case is now on appeal.

The ruling was praised by NAMI-NH and the ACLU of New Hampshire, which each submitted briefings.  The state has struggled for years to provide enough in-patient psychiatric care, resulting in long wait times for treatment. The number of people–both adults and children–awaiting transfer to a psychiatric hospital has ebbed and flowed over the years, including a backlog of more than 80 residents during the pandemic.

Source In February of this year, state Health Commissioner Lori Shibinette said the state would immediately add an additional 10 inpatient beds for children at a state psychiatric facility in Concord. Shibinette said that the bottleneck for treatment beds wasn’t just a result of increased demand, but that there also continues to be a shortage of treatment options in the community.

News Highlights Health

  • NH court rules that the ‘hospitalization in emergencies’ of people with mental health crisis violates the law
  • Check all news and articles from the Health news information updates.
Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit this news or article then please visit our help center.
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
      Bollyinside - US Local News & Breaking News Stories
      Compare items
      • Total (0)