Former President Donald Trump may turn to the Supreme Court for help in his criminal cases related to the 2020 election. While the final outcomes of these cases are unlikely to be appealed to the Supreme Court, Trump may ask the court to decide whether two cases should be moved to federal court, whether he and other former federal officials are entitled to immunity, and whether efforts to limit his public remarks about his legal problems on the 2024 campaign trail violate the First Amendment. Trump has a history of using long-shot appeals as a delay tactic, and while the success of these efforts is uncertain, they could further involve the Supreme Court in politically divisive issues.
Former President Donald Trump may turn to the Supreme Court for help in his criminal cases related to the 2020 election. While the final outcomes of these cases are unlikely to be appealed to the Supreme Court, Trump may ask the court to decide whether two cases should be moved to federal court, whether he and other former federal officials are entitled to immunity, and whether efforts to limit his public remarks about his legal problems on the 2024 campaign trail violate the First Amendment. Trump has a history of using long-shot appeals as a delay tactic, and while the success of these efforts is uncertain, they could further involve the Supreme Court in politically divisive issues.
As per the analysis by a recent article on USA Today, former President Donald Trump may be looking to seek help from the Supreme Court as he faces a 41-count indictment in Georgia for his role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election. While history suggests that Trump is unlikely to receive assistance from the high court, experts believe that he may call on them to weigh in on various questions in the case, as well as in other criminal matters in New York, Florida, and Washington, D.C.
Although the final outcome of these cases is unlikely to be appealed to the Supreme Court, there are several issues that may be brought before the justices. One question that may arise is whether two of the cases should be moved to federal court. Additionally, there may be a debate over whether Trump and other former federal officials are entitled to immunity. Another potential issue is whether efforts to limit Trump’s public remarks about his legal problems on the 2024 campaign trail are consistent with the First Amendment.
Josh Blackman, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, predicts that the Supreme Court will not have an easy time with these appeals. However, the court has repeatedly rejected other appeals from Trump in the past and is keen to avoid engaging in politics.
While the success of these appeals may be uncertain, it is worth noting that Trump has a history of using long-shot appeals as a strategy to delay legal proceedings. The former president has often sought to prolong cases, and this may be his intention once again.
One issue that may be appealed is whether the federal court should take over the Georgia case. Many believe that Trump’s lawyers could build a more conservative jury in federal court, as President Joe Biden won Fulton County with 73% of the vote in 2020. A similar request was made in New York, where Trump faces a 34-count indictment from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. A U.S. district judge denied the request last month, and the former president appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. If the decision of the 2nd Circuit is appealed, it could potentially reach the Supreme Court.
In the grand scheme of things, while former President Donald Trump may seek help from the Supreme Court in his legal battles, history suggests that he is unlikely to receive assistance. The court has repeatedly rejected appeals from Trump in the past and is cautious about engaging in politics. However, Trump has a history of using long-shot appeals as a strategy to delay legal proceedings. The specific issues that may be appealed include whether the cases should be moved to federal court, whether Trump and other former federal officials are entitled to immunity, and whether efforts to limit Trump’s public remarks about his legal problems are consistent with the First Amendment.
Photo Credit: media.npr.org