The cases involve two Arizona voting regulations that are commonly used across the country. We throw away the ballots of those who vote in the wrong riding. Other restrictions that can collect ballots early for delivery to polling stations, a practice denounced by President Donald Trump as “ballot harvesting.”
It wouldn’t be a surprise to see the high court disagree with a lower court ruling and leave the restrictions in place. In an unusual letter, the Biden administration reluctantly agreed that Arizona’s laws did not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which is the section in question.
But the biggest impact will be the test the increasingly conservative court develops to prove violations, as new laws are proposed and state legislatures begin to redesign congressional and parliamentary districts in the wake of the census. from 2020.
Court conservatives in 2013 struck down the most important article of the law, and judges on both sides of the ideological divide appeared to be trying on Tuesday to find common ground.
Growing list compiled by liberal Brennan Center for Justice shows lawmakers in 43 states have crafted more as 253 bills containing provisions aimed at restricting access to the vote.
“More voting restrictions have been enacted in the past decade more than at any time since the end of Jim Crow, ”Bruce V. Spiva, an attorney representing the Democratic National Committee, told the court. “The past three months have seen an even greater increase in…
News Highlights Politics
- Headline: Supreme Court appears to be in favor of retaining voting laws, a lower court deemed unfair to minorities
- Check all news and articles from the Politics news updates.