WASHINGTON – Supreme Court justices asked skeptical questions Tuesday about Arizona’s election laws in a case that has emerged as an important test of voting rights law.
The case concerns whether two state laws violate section 2 of the law: one blocks the counting of ballots cast in the wrong constituency and another prohibits anyone other than a member. family or caregiver to collect and deliver a voter’s mail ballot.
On the one hand, the state of Arizona and the Republicans, who want to keep the laws tough on the books and argue they prevent fraud. And on the other side are the Democrats, who want the laws struck down and argue that the rules prevent voters, especially minorities, from voting.
Voting restrictions are being fought in a state where Republicans have dominated local and national races for generations, but where recently Democrats have gained traction and won both seats in the United States Senate and the presidential contest of the year. last. The outcome of this case could also have far-reaching implications for voting laws in other states.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, two Republican appointments and potentially crucial votes in the case, appeared to wrestle with the arguments as they put tough questions to lawyers on both sides.
Roberts asked the lawyer for the Arizona GOP, which defends the laws, why it is “a bad thing” for election procedures to seek “racial proportionality.”
He later urged the Democrats’ lawyer to define what that would do …
News Highlights Politics
- Headline: Supreme Court Questions Need for Restrictive Voting Laws in Voting Rights Act Case
- Check all news and articles from the Politics news updates.