FigJam vs Miro: choose one online collaborative whiteboard tool

Figma made FigJam, an online tool for making whiteboards with other people. It was made so that people can work together and share ideas in real time. Users can share ideas, sketch them out, and work on them together on FigJam’s virtual whiteboard. It has things like sticky notes, drawings, shapes, connectors, and the ability to leave comments. FigJam is designed to help teams work together quickly and effectively, especially in the early stages of designing and coming up with ideas.

Miro, on the other hand, is a flexible online platform for working together that includes a digital whiteboard and many other tools for teams to work together. It has a lot of different features, like whiteboarding, sticky notes, diagrams, mind maps, wireframing, and more. Miro is all about working together as a team, doing work from afar, and sharing ideas visually. It lets people work together in real time, so they can all work on the same board at the same time. Miro is often used to plan projects, come up with ideas, do design thinking, and work with remote teams.

FigJam vs Miro Pricing

FigJam is a part of the design tool Figma, and whether or not you can use it depends on how much you pay for Figma. Users who already have a subscription to Figma can use FigJam for free, which makes it a useful extra for Figma users.

Miro, on the other hand, has different pricing plans to meet the needs of different people. It has tiered features for both free and paid plans. The free plan has limited features and a limited number of team members. The paid plans, on the other hand, have more features, more storage, and more ways to work together. Miro’s prices depend on the plan you choose, the number of users, and the features you want.

FigJam vs Miro Comparison Table

FigJam and Miro are necessary depending on how you like to work together. FigJam is a must-have if you want to work together creatively and on the spot with a simple approach.

FigJam vs Miro Design workflow

FigJam has an advantage over its competitors because it automatically works with your Figma libraries. When you make a design system, you publish libraries with components, which are reusable interface elements like buttons, inputs, toasts, pop-ups, and so on. You can use these parts on FigJam’s whiteboard to make it easier for design teams to build screens and show how their ideas work.

When you open a library in FigJam, it floats above your board at first. When you drag an object to your board, the library goes away. But if you want, you can also pin the component library to the board so that the building blocks are always close at hand.Another cool thing about FigJam is that you can keep all of your workshop, research, and user interface (UI) files in one place. It used to be really annoying to export projects from Miro.

Not only did you have to look for the export feature, but sometimes you also had to unlock and shrink certain boards before you could export them. You can easily copy user flows and other ideas that came up in workshops from FigJam to other files on Figma. Also, comments made by clients, developers, and members of the digital product design team won’t be lost during the export.

FigJam vs Miro Interface and Workflow Capabilities

The interface of FigJam is simple and easy to use, but you can also dig deeper when you need to. The app is simple and stylish. It has a clean color palette, an easy-to-use layout, and a search bar that makes it easy to find what you’re looking for. With the FigJam community, it’s easy to look at all of the different types of templates on the site. The diagramming interface is more fun and interactive because of the skeuomorphic elements at the bottom of the toolbar.

The design assets automatically sync with your existing libraries on Figma, so you can easily use parts of your design system in your FigJam whiteboards. What happened? More people working together means less time wasted on reinventing the wheel and a better final product.

Miro also has a lot of features and an easy-to-use interface. Miro is also a good option if you’re looking for a whiteboard solution that can work with a wide range of file types, integrations, and plugins. This is a great feature if you need to work with a lot of different tools and file types on a project together.

FigJam vs Miro: Collaborative Features

FigJam places a strong emphasis on working together with others. Real-time collaboration on whiteboards is made available by the technology, which encourages both teamwork and creative thinking. Users are able to collaborate on brainstorming, ideation, and iteration in a seamless manner.

Miro is exceptional when it comes to its collaboration capabilities, as it offers a wide variety of interactive tools that allow teams to efficiently collaborate in real time. It places an emphasis not only on cooperation within teams but also on collaboration between different departments.

FigJam vs Miro: Real-time Editing and Communication

It is possible for users to view changes in real time because to FigJam’s ability to promote rapid editing and conversation. With features such as commenting and replies, the platform makes communication more effective, hence fostering an environment that is conducive to dynamic collaboration.

In addition, Miro allows for real-time editing and communication, which guarantees that all members of the team are constantly present and on the same page. The chat and commenting elements of the platform contribute to the platform’s ability to facilitate instant and efficient communication.

FigJam vs Miro: Tool Integrations

As a result of its seamless integration with a variety of tools, FigJam improves the efficiency of workflow. Users have the ability to connect FigJam with their chosen tools, such as Slack and Google Workspace, in order to facilitate a more efficient method of collaboration.

Miro is compatible with a broad variety of third-party integrations, such as well-known cloud storage platforms and project management software. Because of this, it is guaranteed that teams will be able to integrate Miro into their existing workflow without problems.

FigJam vs Miro: Use Cases and Industry Applications

Because of its adaptability, FigJam is utilised in a wide range of business establishments. It is especially useful for design teams because it makes it easier for them to collaborate on drawing and wireframing. Furthermore, it is an effective instrument for ideation and brainstorming sessions, which are both highly beneficial.

A wide variety of industries, including product development, marketing, and project management, have used Miro to a significant increase. It is useful for a wide variety of jobs, ranging from visual collaboration to complicated project planning, due to the extensive collection of functions that it possesses.

Which is better?

FigJam and Miro depend on how you want to work together. FigJam’s whiteboard experience is simple and unplanned, making it perfect for freeform expression and creation. Agile teams that want something simple will like it. Miro is an all-in-one digital whiteboard with flexible features and templates that can be changed to fit your needs.

It can be used for organised collaboration, project planning, and design thinking. If you like to work in a casual and unstructured way, FigJam might be better for you. For people who need a strong, flexible digital whiteboard with organised collaboration features, Miro has a wider range of tools and templates to meet all of their visual collaboration needs.

FAQs